NetInverse Developers Blog

April 23, 2009
Category: .Net, CLR, Debugging — Tags: , , — admin @ 10:14 pm

CLR Internal: SyncBlock

CLR Object Internal - from Shared Source CLI Essentials

CLR Object Internal - from Shared Source CLI Essentials

Every Object is preceded by an ObjHeader (at a negative offset). The ObjHeader has an index to a SyncBlock. This index is 0 for the bulk of all instances, which indicates that the object shares a dummy SyncBlock with most other objects. All SyncBlocks are stored in SyncTable as an array and managed by SyncBlockCache.

The SyncBlock is primarily responsible for object synchronization. However, it is also a “kitchen sink” of sparsely allocated instance data. For instance, the default implementation of Hash() is based on the existence of a SyncTableEntry. And objects exposed to or from COM, or through context boundaries, can store sparse data here.

SyncTableEntries and SyncBlocks are allocated in non-GC memory. A weak pointer from the SyncTableEntry to the instance is used to ensure that the SyncBlock and SyncTableEntry are reclaimed (recycled) when the instance dies.

The organization of the SyncBlocks isn’t intuitive (at least to me). Here’s the explanation:

Before each Object is an ObjHeader. If the object has a SyncBlock, the ObjHeader contains a non-0 index to it.

The index is looked up in the g_pSyncTable of SyncTableEntries. This means the table is consecutive for all outstanding indices. Whenever it needs to grow, it doubles in size and copies all the original entries. The old table is kept until GC time, when it can be safely discarded.

Each SyncTableEntry has a backpointer to the object and a forward pointer to the actual SyncBlock. The SyncBlock is allocated out of a SyncBlockArray which is essentially just a block of SyncBlocks.

The SyncBlockArrays are managed by a SyncBlockCache that handles the actual allocations and frees of the blocks.

Each allocation and release has to handle free lists in the table of entries and the table of blocks.

We burn an extra 4 bytes for the pointer from the SyncTableEntry to the SyncBlock.

The reason for this is that many objects have a SyncTableEntry but no SyncBlock. That’s because someone (e.g. HashTable) called Hash() on them.

- syncblk.h

April 22, 2009
Category: CLR, Debugging — Tags: , , , , , — admin @ 12:08 am

An object’s CLR internal structure is:

[DWORD: SyncBlock][DWORD: MethodTable Pointer][DWORD: Reference type pointer]…[Value of Value Type field]…

Object Header: [DWORD: SyncBlock]
Object Pointer: [DWORD: MethodTable Pointer][DWORD: Reference type pointer]…[Value of Value Type field]…

Every Object is preceded by an ObjHeader (at a negative offset). The ObjHeader has an index to a SyncBlock.

Sample C# code for exploring CLR object’s internal structure

namespace ObjectInternal
{
    using System;
    using System.Collections.Generic;
    using System.Linq;
    using System.Text;

    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Product p = new Product();
            p.Price = 99;
            p.Index = 25;
            p.Name = "Super Product";
            p.Cat = new Cateogry();
        }
    }

    class Product
    {
        public int Price { get; set; }
        public byte Index { get; set; }
        public string Name { get; set; }
        public Cateogry Cat { get; set; }
    }

    public class Cateogry
    {
        public string Name;
    }
}

Sample output from SOS.dll debugger extension:

.load sos
extension C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\sos.dll loaded

!dumpstackobjects
PDB symbol for mscorwks.dll not loaded
OS Thread Id: 0xbb4 (2996)
ESP/REG  Object   Name
0012f0d4 012c2c10 System.Object[]    (System.String[])
0012f20c 012c2c10 System.Object[]    (System.String[])
0012f218 012c2c4c ObjectInternal.Product
0012f21c 012c2c64 ObjectInternal.Cateogry
0012f438 012c2c64 ObjectInternal.Cateogry
0012f43c 012c2c4c ObjectInternal.Product
0012f440 012c2c4c ObjectInternal.Product
0012f444 012c2c10 System.Object[]    (System.String[])
0012f534 012c2c10 System.Object[]    (System.String[])
0012f6e0 012c2c10 System.Object[]    (System.String[])
0012f708 012c2c10 System.Object[]    (System.String[])

!dumpobj 012c2c4c
Name: ObjectInternal.Product
MethodTable: 00933138
EEClass: 00931384
Size: 24(0x18) bytes
 (C:\temp\ObjectInternal\ObjectInternal\bin\Debug\ObjectInternal.exe)
Fields:
      MT    Field   Offset                 Type VT     Attr    Value Name
79332c4c  4000001        c         System.Int32  1 instance       99 <Price>k__BackingField
79333520  4000002       10          System.Byte  1 instance       25 <Index>k__BackingField
79330a00  4000003        4        System.String  0 instance 012c2c20 <Name>k__BackingField
009331b0  4000004        8 ...Internal.Cateogry  0 instance 012c2c64 <Cat>k__BackingField

!dumpobj 012c2c20
Name: System.String
MethodTable: 79330a00
EEClass: 790ed64c
Size: 44(0x2c) bytes
 (C:\WINDOWS\assembly\GAC_32\mscorlib\2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089\mscorlib.dll)
String: Super Product
Fields:
      MT    Field   Offset                 Type VT     Attr    Value Name
79332c4c  4000096        4         System.Int32  1 instance       14 m_arrayLength
79332c4c  4000097        8         System.Int32  1 instance       13 m_stringLength
793316e0  4000098        c          System.Char  1 instance       53 m_firstChar
79330a00  4000099       10        System.String  0   shared   static Empty
    >> Domain:Value  0015d370:012c1198 <<
79331630  400009a       14        System.Char[]  0   shared   static WhitespaceChars
    >> Domain:Value  0015d370:012c1790 <<

Physical memory layout of CLR objects:

CLR Object's Internal Structure

CLR Object's Internal Structure

We use !dumpobj to examine Product object instance, which is located at address: 0×012c2c4c. You can see that: field Name(String “Super Product”)’s address is 0×012c2c20, MethodTable is 0×79330a00. Field Cateogry’s address is 0×012c2c64 and MethodTable is 0×009331b0. Value types are directly stored as 0×63(99) and 0×19(25).

March 4, 2009
Category: .Net — Tags: , , , — admin @ 11:03 pm

Please read the following sample code with Monitor.Enter and Monitor.Exit. Does the lock work?

class LockMe
{
    private static int counter = 0;
    public void Lock()
    {
       Monitor.Enter(counter);
       counter++;
       Monitor.Exit(counter);
    }

No! The code actually is totally wrong. You are not supposed to lock a value type, which doesn’t have a SyncBlock field. Monitor.Enter(counter) will cause an int(counter) to be boxed first and then you are getting the lock from a box object, not the int itself. The lock won’t work as you expected, since a different object(a different SyncBlock) will be used each time.

©2009 NetInverse. All rights reserved. Powered by WordPress